Stock comparison
Yum China Holdings, Inc. is 1.0x more valuable than Aramark by market capitalization ($15.22 B vs $14.93 B). Compare market value, revenue, profit, margins, filings, and source pages in one place.
Quick answer
YUMC is larger
Yum China Holdings, Inc. is 1.0x more valuable than Aramark by market capitalization ($15.22 B vs $14.93 B).
Market value leader
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc. is 1.0x more valuable than Aramark by market capitalization ($15.22 B vs $14.93 B).
Revenue leader
ARMK
ARMK: $18.51B vs YUMC: $11.80B.
Profit leader
YUMC
ARMK: $326.39M vs YUMC: $929.00M.
Margin leader
YUMC
ARMK: 1.8% vs YUMC: 7.9% net margin.
| Metric | ARMK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $14.93 B | $15.22 B |
| US-listed rank | #744 | #732 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $18.51B | $11.80B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $326.39M | $929.00M |
| Net margin | 1.8% | 7.9% |
| P/E (trailing FY) | 45.7x | 16.4x |
| SEC filings | 2,086 | 1,168 |
Jump from this comparison into the underlying pages for market value, annual fundamentals, and company filing history.
Market cap uses refreshed market data. Revenue, net income, margins, and trailing fiscal-year P/E use annual company facts from filings. If a metric is missing, the source data did not have a clean recent annual value for that company.
Yum China Holdings, Inc. is 1.0x more valuable than Aramark by market capitalization ($15.22 B vs $14.93 B).
In their latest fiscal years, Aramark reported $18.51B in revenue while Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported $11.80B.
Full pages: Aramark and Yum China Holdings, Inc., or browse the full rankings.