Stock comparison
3M CO is 1.7x more valuable than BECTON DICKINSON & CO by market capitalization ($86.93 B vs $50.90 B). Compare market value, revenue, profit, margins, filings, and source pages in one place.
Quick answer
MMM is larger
3M CO is 1.7x more valuable than BECTON DICKINSON & CO by market capitalization ($86.93 B vs $50.90 B).
Market value leader
MMM
3M CO is 1.7x more valuable than BECTON DICKINSON & CO by market capitalization ($86.93 B vs $50.90 B).
Revenue leader
MMM
BDX: $21.84B vs MMM: $24.95B.
Profit leader
MMM
BDX: $1.68B vs MMM: $3.25B.
Margin leader
MMM
BDX: 7.7% vs MMM: 13.0% net margin.
| Metric | BDX | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $50.90 B | $86.93 B |
| US-listed rank | #321 | #189 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $21.84B | $24.95B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.68B | $3.25B |
| Net margin | 7.7% | 13.0% |
| P/E (trailing FY) | 30.3x | 26.7x |
| SEC filings | 3,027 | 1,001 |
Jump from this comparison into the underlying pages for market value, annual fundamentals, and company filing history.
Market cap uses refreshed market data. Revenue, net income, margins, and trailing fiscal-year P/E use annual company facts from filings. If a metric is missing, the source data did not have a clean recent annual value for that company.
3M CO is 1.7x more valuable than BECTON DICKINSON & CO by market capitalization ($86.93 B vs $50.90 B).
In their latest fiscal years, BECTON DICKINSON & CO reported $21.84B in revenue while 3M CO reported $24.95B.
Full pages: BECTON DICKINSON & CO and 3M CO, or browse the full rankings.