Stock comparison
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP is 4.4x more valuable than COMMERCIAL METALS Co by market capitalization ($29.36 B vs $6.67 B). Compare market value, revenue, profit, margins, filings, and source pages in one place.
Quick answer
CRS is larger
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP is 4.4x more valuable than COMMERCIAL METALS Co by market capitalization ($29.36 B vs $6.67 B).
Market value leader
CRS
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP is 4.4x more valuable than COMMERCIAL METALS Co by market capitalization ($29.36 B vs $6.67 B).
Revenue leader
CMC
CMC: $7.80B vs CRS: $2.88B.
Profit leader
CRS
CMC: $84.66M vs CRS: $376.00M.
Margin leader
CRS
CMC: 1.1% vs CRS: 13.1% net margin.
| Metric | CMC | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $6.67 B | $29.36 B |
| US-listed rank | #1207 | #477 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $7.80B | $2.88B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $84.66M | $376.00M |
| Net margin | 1.1% | 13.1% |
| P/E (trailing FY) | 78.7x | 78.1x |
| SEC filings | 2,467 | 2,345 |
Jump from this comparison into the underlying pages for market value, annual fundamentals, and company filing history.
Market cap uses refreshed market data. Revenue, net income, margins, and trailing fiscal-year P/E use annual company facts from filings. If a metric is missing, the source data did not have a clean recent annual value for that company.
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP is 4.4x more valuable than COMMERCIAL METALS Co by market capitalization ($29.36 B vs $6.67 B).
In their latest fiscal years, COMMERCIAL METALS Co reported $7.80B in revenue while CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP reported $2.88B.
Full pages: COMMERCIAL METALS Co and CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP, or browse the full rankings.