Stock comparison
Aramark is 1.0x more valuable than Yum China Holdings, Inc. by market capitalization ($15.22 B vs $14.77 B). Compare market value, revenue, profit, margins, filings, and source pages in one place.
Quick answer
ARMK is larger
Aramark is 1.0x more valuable than Yum China Holdings, Inc. by market capitalization ($15.22 B vs $14.77 B).
Market value leader
ARMK
Aramark is 1.0x more valuable than Yum China Holdings, Inc. by market capitalization ($15.22 B vs $14.77 B).
Revenue leader
ARMK
YUMC: $11.80B vs ARMK: $18.51B.
Profit leader
YUMC
YUMC: $929.00M vs ARMK: $326.39M.
Margin leader
YUMC
YUMC: 7.9% vs ARMK: 1.8% net margin.
| Metric | YUMC | ARMK |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $14.77 B | $15.22 B |
| US-listed rank | #748 | #733 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $11.80B | $18.51B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $929.00M | $326.39M |
| Net margin | 7.9% | 1.8% |
| P/E (trailing FY) | 15.9x | 46.6x |
| SEC filings | 1,168 | 2,086 |
Jump from this comparison into the underlying pages for market value, annual fundamentals, and company filing history.
Market cap uses refreshed market data. Revenue, net income, margins, and trailing fiscal-year P/E use annual company facts from filings. If a metric is missing, the source data did not have a clean recent annual value for that company.
Aramark is 1.0x more valuable than Yum China Holdings, Inc. by market capitalization ($15.22 B vs $14.77 B).
In their latest fiscal years, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported $11.80B in revenue while Aramark reported $18.51B.
Full pages: Yum China Holdings, Inc. and Aramark, or browse the full rankings.