Stock comparison
Restaurant Brands International Inc. is 1.8x more valuable than Yum China Holdings, Inc. by market capitalization ($26.03 B vs $14.77 B). Compare market value, revenue, profit, margins, filings, and source pages in one place.
Quick answer
QSR is larger
Restaurant Brands International Inc. is 1.8x more valuable than Yum China Holdings, Inc. by market capitalization ($26.03 B vs $14.77 B).
Market value leader
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc. is 1.8x more valuable than Yum China Holdings, Inc. by market capitalization ($26.03 B vs $14.77 B).
Revenue leader
YUMC
QSR: $9.43B vs YUMC: $11.80B.
Profit leader
QSR
QSR: $1.07B vs YUMC: $929.00M.
Margin leader
QSR
QSR: 11.4% vs YUMC: 7.9% net margin.
| Metric | QSR | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $26.03 B | $14.77 B |
| US-listed rank | #525 | #748 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $9.43B | $11.80B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.07B | $929.00M |
| Net margin | 11.4% | 7.9% |
| P/E (trailing FY) | 24.2x | 15.9x |
| SEC filings | 1,404 | 1,168 |
Jump from this comparison into the underlying pages for market value, annual fundamentals, and company filing history.
Market cap uses refreshed market data. Revenue, net income, margins, and trailing fiscal-year P/E use annual company facts from filings. If a metric is missing, the source data did not have a clean recent annual value for that company.
Restaurant Brands International Inc. is 1.8x more valuable than Yum China Holdings, Inc. by market capitalization ($26.03 B vs $14.77 B).
In their latest fiscal years, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported $9.43B in revenue while Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported $11.80B.
Full pages: Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Yum China Holdings, Inc., or browse the full rankings.